Proposition 42, the retroactive tax prohibition measure on California's November 2026 ballot, remains closely balanced as voters weigh its constitutional ban on new personal property taxes and retroactive levies against Proposition 40's proposed one-time wealth tax on billionaires. The slight edge for rejection reflects competing priorities: revenue needs for state programs versus concerns over residency-based retroactivity dating to January 2026 and potential impacts on high-net-worth residents. Key factors include campaign spending by business and taxpayer groups, endorsements from fiscal conservatives, and early polling on tax tolerance amid budget pressures. Upcoming voter guides, signature validation updates, and any shifts in economic data could alter consensus before election day, as could coordinated messaging linking the two measures.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedCalifornia Retroactive Tax Prohibition Proposition
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
Market Opened: Jul 1, 2026, 6:25 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to “Yes” if the specified ballot measure is approved by a majority of voters at the California statewide general election currently scheduled for November 3, 2026. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
If voting on the specified ballot measure does not occur, or the results thereof are not known definitively, by March 31, 2027, this market will resolve to “No”.
This market will resolve based on a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve solely based on official information from the State of California, including the California Secretary of State (https://www.sos.ca.gov/).
Resolver
0x65070BE91...Proposition 42, the retroactive tax prohibition measure on California's November 2026 ballot, remains closely balanced as voters weigh its constitutional ban on new personal property taxes and retroactive levies against Proposition 40's proposed one-time wealth tax on billionaires. The slight edge for rejection reflects competing priorities: revenue needs for state programs versus concerns over residency-based retroactivity dating to January 2026 and potential impacts on high-net-worth residents. Key factors include campaign spending by business and taxpayer groups, endorsements from fiscal conservatives, and early polling on tax tolerance amid budget pressures. Upcoming voter guides, signature validation updates, and any shifts in economic data could alter consensus before election day, as could coordinated messaging linking the two measures.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions