The Trump administration’s June 2026 export controls on Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and Fable 5 large language models, prompted by cybersecurity vulnerabilities and jailbreak risks, temporarily halted public access but were fully lifted within weeks once the company implemented stronger safeguards and agreed to government collaboration protocols. OpenAI similarly restricted its GPT-5.6 preview at the White House’s request before planning broader availability. These events reinforced a voluntary pre-release review framework under the June executive order rather than permanent bans, with no further formal actions or incidents reported through August. Traders assign the 78.5% “No” probability because the episode proved short-lived, industry incentives favor continued access, and the administration has signaled preference for targeted safeguards over broad public removals of frontier models.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · UpdatedUS Government removes public access to another major AI model in 2026?
$17,005 Vol.
$17,005 Vol.
$17,005 Vol.
$17,005 Vol.
A qualifying action is a formal US government action that has the effect of a general removal of public access to a previously publicly available AI model within the US. Such an action qualifies, regardless of its stated purpose or nominal target. An action directed at other parties qualifies if, in effect, it causes a general removal of public access to the model within the US (e.g., a ban on the provision of a model to foreign citizens or governments would qualify if, due to the ban, the providing company generally removed public access to the model within the US). A general removal of public access to a qualifying model qualifies even if it does not apply to limited groups or organizations (e.g., whitelisted firms or individuals with security clearance). To qualify, ordinary public access to the model must be eliminated across ordinary public channels within the US; removal from a single channel is not sufficient. Removals of general public access not caused by any formal US government action will not qualify.
"Major AI model" refers to a flagship, general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model developed by one of the following companies: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google (including Google DeepMind), Meta, xAI, Microsoft, Amazon, Mistral AI, DeepSeek, Alibaba, ByteDance, Moonshot AI, and Zhipu AI (Z.ai). Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
The action may target a single model or a slate of models, so long as at least one major AI model is generally removed from public access within the US as a result of the action.
The removal of access for any amount of time qualifies. An action that has been enacted or issued, but which has not effected the removal of general public access to a major model by the resolution date, will not qualify.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the relevant AI company. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Market Opened: Jul 3, 2026, 5:48 PM ET
Resolver
0x65070BE91...A qualifying action is a formal US government action that has the effect of a general removal of public access to a previously publicly available AI model within the US. Such an action qualifies, regardless of its stated purpose or nominal target. An action directed at other parties qualifies if, in effect, it causes a general removal of public access to the model within the US (e.g., a ban on the provision of a model to foreign citizens or governments would qualify if, due to the ban, the providing company generally removed public access to the model within the US). A general removal of public access to a qualifying model qualifies even if it does not apply to limited groups or organizations (e.g., whitelisted firms or individuals with security clearance). To qualify, ordinary public access to the model must be eliminated across ordinary public channels within the US; removal from a single channel is not sufficient. Removals of general public access not caused by any formal US government action will not qualify.
"Major AI model" refers to a flagship, general-purpose large language or multimodal foundation model developed by one of the following companies: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google (including Google DeepMind), Meta, xAI, Microsoft, Amazon, Mistral AI, DeepSeek, Alibaba, ByteDance, Moonshot AI, and Zhipu AI (Z.ai). Narrow or special-purpose models (e.g., embedding, moderation, or single-modality media generation models) and deprecated, research-only, or preview-only models will not qualify.
The action may target a single model or a slate of models, so long as at least one major AI model is generally removed from public access within the US as a result of the action.
The removal of access for any amount of time qualifies. An action that has been enacted or issued, but which has not effected the removal of general public access to a major model by the resolution date, will not qualify.
The resolution source for this market is official information and announcements from the United States government and the relevant AI company. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Resolver
0x65070BE91...The Trump administration’s June 2026 export controls on Anthropic’s Mythos 5 and Fable 5 large language models, prompted by cybersecurity vulnerabilities and jailbreak risks, temporarily halted public access but were fully lifted within weeks once the company implemented stronger safeguards and agreed to government collaboration protocols. OpenAI similarly restricted its GPT-5.6 preview at the White House’s request before planning broader availability. These events reinforced a voluntary pre-release review framework under the June executive order rather than permanent bans, with no further formal actions or incidents reported through August. Traders assign the 78.5% “No” probability because the episode proved short-lived, industry incentives favor continued access, and the administration has signaled preference for targeted safeguards over broad public removals of frontier models.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated


Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions