Trump maintains an active schedule of Truth Social posts, speeches, and public remarks amid ongoing tensions over Iran sanctions, trade disputes with Canada, and midterm positioning, patterns that have produced repeated personal attacks on political figures, journalists, and foreign leaders in recent weeks. Recent examples include references to New York Attorney General Letitia James as a “real slob,” exchanges with Ontario Premier Doug Ford over tariffs, and responses to criticism from Sen. Jon Ossoff. With only days remaining until the August 31 resolution window closes, traders focus on the narrow timeframe, Trump’s established preference for direct language in unscripted or social-media settings, and any scheduled appearances or breaking developments that could prompt new targets before the deadline.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated$58,634 Vol.
Aug 31, 2026
Jimmy Kimmel
21%
Kaitlan Collins
28%
Candace Owens
28%
Alex Jones
17%
Zohran Mamdani
16%
Pam Bondi
15%
Friedrich Merz
10%
Jerome Powell
10%
Megyn Kelly
8%
Andy Burnham
8%
Kevin Warsh
6%
Emmanuel Macron
5%
Norah O'Donnell
5%
Viktor Orbán
4%
Pope Leo XIV
3%
J.D. Vance
3%
Elon Musk
2%
Xi Jinping
2%
Vladimir Putin
2%
Benjamin Netanyahu
15%
Mohammed bin Salman
2%
Melania Trump
1%
$58,634 Vol.
Jimmy Kimmel
$255 Vol.
21%
Kaitlan Collins
$919 Vol.
28%
Candace Owens
$9,782 Vol.
28%
Alex Jones
$5,066 Vol.
17%
Zohran Mamdani
$193 Vol.
16%
Pam Bondi
$268 Vol.
15%
Friedrich Merz
$1,666 Vol.
10%
Jerome Powell
$116 Vol.
10%
Megyn Kelly
$1,075 Vol.
8%
Andy Burnham
$1,527 Vol.
8%
Kevin Warsh
$787 Vol.
6%
Emmanuel Macron
$1,685 Vol.
5%
Norah O'Donnell
$1,840 Vol.
5%
Viktor Orbán
$0 Vol.
4%
Pope Leo XIV
$2,897 Vol.
3%
J.D. Vance
$799 Vol.
3%
Elon Musk
$1,847 Vol.
2%
Xi Jinping
$1,416 Vol.
2%
Vladimir Putin
$1,889 Vol.
2%
Benjamin Netanyahu
$543 Vol.
15%
Mohammed bin Salman
$70 Vol.
2%
Melania Trump
$2,988 Vol.
1%
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump maintains an active schedule of Truth Social posts, speeches, and public remarks amid ongoing tensions over Iran sanctions, trade disputes with Canada, and midterm positioning, patterns that have produced repeated personal attacks on political figures, journalists, and foreign leaders in recent weeks. Recent examples include references to New York Attorney General Letitia James as a “real slob,” exchanges with Ontario Premier Doug Ford over tariffs, and responses to criticism from Sen. Jon Ossoff. With only days remaining until the August 31 resolution window closes, traders focus on the narrow timeframe, Trump’s established preference for direct language in unscripted or social-media settings, and any scheduled appearances or breaking developments that could prompt new targets before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Market Opened: Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ET
Volume
$58,634End Date
Aug 31, 2026Market Opened
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.Trump maintains an active schedule of Truth Social posts, speeches, and public remarks amid ongoing tensions over Iran sanctions, trade disputes with Canada, and midterm positioning, patterns that have produced repeated personal attacks on political figures, journalists, and foreign leaders in recent weeks. Recent examples include references to New York Attorney General Letitia James as a “real slob,” exchanges with Ontario Premier Doug Ford over tariffs, and responses to criticism from Sen. Jon Ossoff. With only days remaining until the August 31 resolution window closes, traders focus on the narrow timeframe, Trump’s established preference for direct language in unscripted or social-media settings, and any scheduled appearances or breaking developments that could prompt new targets before the deadline.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify.
Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. A quote post will only qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult; a repost of another account's post will not qualify.
A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare").
A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject.
The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.
Volume
$58,634End Date
Aug 31, 2026Market Opened
Jul 31, 2026, 10:33 AM ETResolver
0x65070BE91...Trump maintains an active schedule of Truth Social posts, speeches, and public remarks amid ongoing tensions over Iran sanctions, trade disputes with Canada, and midterm positioning, patterns that have produced repeated personal attacks on political figures, journalists, and foreign leaders in recent weeks. Recent examples include references to New York Attorney General Letitia James as a “real slob,” exchanges with Ontario Premier Doug Ford over tariffs, and responses to criticism from Sen. Jon Ossoff. With only days remaining until the August 31 resolution window closes, traders focus on the narrow timeframe, Trump’s established preference for direct language in unscripted or social-media settings, and any scheduled appearances or breaking developments that could prompt new targets before the deadline.
Experimental AI-generated summary referencing Polymarket data. This is not trading advice and plays no role in how this market resolves. · Updated
Beware of external links.
Beware of external links.
Frequently Asked Questions